If you are a Javascript developer, you are surely familiar with modules, one of the most important and useful features of the language. However, there is some confusion about the different types of modules that can be used. In this article, we are going to compare two of the most common types: CommonJS and ES Modules, and discuss which is the best option in different scenarios.
CommonJS
CommonJS is a module format that was originally created for use in server environments, such as Node.js. It is based on the use of the function require() to import modules and keyword exports to expose objects and functions that can be used by other modules.
One of the main advantages of CommonJS is its simplicity and ease of use. It is very easy to understand and use, and can be used intuitively by even the least experienced developers. Additionally, the Node.js developer community has generated a large number of modules that use the CommonJS format, making a broad ecosystem of libraries available.
However, one of the disadvantages of CommonJS is that it is not directly supported by web browsers. This means that if you want to use CommonJS modules on the client side, you'll need a build tool or compiler to convert your code into a format that browsers can understand.
ES Modules
ES Modules, short for ECMAScript Modules, is the native module format introduced in the ES6 Javascript standard. Like CommonJS, it allows importing and exporting modules, but uses a different syntax: import y export.
ES Modules has several advantages over CommonJS. The first is that it is supported directly by modern web browsers, so no additional build tool is needed to use modules in browsers. Additionally, ES Modules are standard Javascript, meaning there is no dependency on additional libraries or tools.
One of the disadvantages of ES Modules is that its syntax is more complex than CommonJS, which can make it difficult to adopt for less experienced developers. Furthermore, although more and more browsers support it, not all do so yet, so there may be compatibility problems in some environments.
Which is the best option?
Now that we have seen the features and advantages of CommonJS and ES Modules, the question is: which is the best option? The answer depends on the scenario you find yourself in.
If you're developing for the Node.js environment or need to use libraries and modules from the Node.js community, CommonJS is still a solid choice. Its simplicity and wide availability of modules make it a popular choice for many Node.js developers.
On the other hand, if you are building a web application and want to use modules directly in the browser, ES Modules is the best option. Its native integration into modern browsers and language standardization make it a solid long-term choice. Additionally, modern build and compile tools like Webpack and Babel can help you troubleshoot any compatibility or limitation issues.
In summary, both CommonJS and ES Modules are valid options, and the choice depends on the context and your specific needs. Over time, ES Modules are likely to become the dominant choice due to their standardization and native compatibility with web browsers.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use CommonJS modules in the browser?
Yes, you can use CommonJS modules in the browser using build and compile tools such as Webpack and Babel.
What build tools can I use with ES modules?
To use ES modules in production environments, you can use tools such as Webpack, Rollup, and Parcel.
When should I use CommonJS instead of ES Modules?
You should use CommonJS if you are developing for Node.js or need to use libraries and modules from the Node.js community.
When should I use ES Modules instead of CommonJS?
You should use ES Modules if you are building a web application and want to use modules directly in the browser.
I hope this article helped you understand the differences between CommonJS and ES Modules and which is the best option in different scenarios. If you have any additional questions, feel free to contact me through my blog NelkoDev.
English 
Spanish