In the ins and outs of application development with JavaScript, two protagonists stand out in the management of dependencies and modules: ES Modules (ESM) and CommonJS (CJS). Their evolution and rivalry have had significant repercussions on the JavaScript ecosystem, shaping not only the syntax of the code, but also the architecture and performance of applications.
The Fundamentals of CommonJS and ES Modules
Let's start by deciphering what exactly CommonJS and ES Modules are. CommonJS is a de facto standard that emerged with Node.js to make it easier to create reusable modules. Its syntax is easy to recognize:
const moduleA = require('moduleA'); module.exports = { doSomething: function() { // Code } };On the other hand, ES Modules is the official ECMAScript standard for importing and exporting modules, and it looks something like this:
import moduleA from 'moduleA'; export function doSomething() { // Code }Technical Aspects: Syntax and Features
CommonJS: Simplicity and Compatibility
The heyday of CommonJS was due to its native compatibility with Node.js and its simplicity. There was no need to set up a build system, which meant you could write and run your code immediately. Additionally, CommonJS loaded modules synchronously, closely tied to the event-driven architecture of Node.js.
ES Modules: Evolution and Standardization
The introduction of ES Modules brought with it a more declarative and static system. ESMs are loaded asynchronously, which is ideal for the browser allowing code-splitting and lazy-loading. This approach is more predictable at compile time and favors optimization by JavaScript engines.
The Battle for Adoption
The transition from CommonJS to ES Modules was not instantaneous. Initially, the Node.js community was deeply rooted in CJS, and there were significant challenges in interconnecting the two systems. Build and transpilation tools like Babel and Webpack had to offer support for both modules, creating a kind of bridge between the past and the present.
Performance and Practical Implications
In terms of performance, asynchronous loading of ESM can result in a noticeable improvement in the loading time of web applications. Additionally, thanks to the static nature of ESM, treeshaking tools can better remove dead code, thus reducing the final package size.
But not all is perfect. The drawback comes from the complexity that can arise when integrating legacy module systems with ESM, sometimes having to resort to hybrid solutions or compatibility layers that can affect performance.
Impact on the Development of Libraries and Frameworks
With the advent of ESM, many library and framework maintainers have migrated or had to offer support for both module systems. This has increased the complexity of maintenance, but has also opened doors for new libraries to be built from scratch with ESM, taking advantage of its benefits.
Compatibility and Polyfills
Compatibility remains a crucial issue. Although modern browsers support ESM, the fact is that CJS dominates Node.js. This has led to the creation of polyfills and the implementation of features in Node.js to facilitate interaction with ESM, such as the introduction of the field "type": "module" in the package.json.
Community and Ecosystem
The impact of this duality of modules transcends the code; It affects communities, educational resources and decision-making in new projects. Since both systems coexist, developers must be familiar with the differences and possible interoperability problems.
ES Modules in Node.js
Node.js began offering experimental support for ES Modules since version 8.5, and stable support arrived with version 13.2. Although Node.js still uses CommonJS by default, the trend indicates a slow but sure movement towards ESM.
The Future of Modules in JavaScript
The future seems to be leaning towards ES Modules, but CommonJS is unlikely to disappear anytime soon given the vast number of existing modules. Older packages still require the old system, and it will be a matter of time before ESMs completely dominate.
Conclusion
Choosing between CommonJS and ES Modules is not just a matter of preference; has significant implications on the structure and performance of applications. As the ecosystem evolves, so does the knowledge required to navigate it effectively. While ES Modules seem to be the way to go, the coexistence of both systems underscores the importance of understanding the impact and role of each in the JavaScript ecosystem.
To stay up to date with these changes and more details of JavaScript development, feel free to visit my blog at nelkodev.com. And if you have questions or need advice on your projects, contact me through nelkodev.com/contact and I will help you with whatever you need.
English 
Spanish